Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:25

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Where the Stock Market Stands Now After a Wild Start to the Year - Bloomberg.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
How can someone effectively handle a targeted individual?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
What are some key features of Google Gemini 2.0?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is a housing crisis looming in China?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What would be the lowest score with 9 strikes and no gutter balls?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Adopting the MIND Diet May Lower Dementia Risk at Any Age - Neuroscience News
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Do women really cheat more than men?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
The ‘golden summer of cheap flights’: Now’s the time for last-minute deals - CNN